Michael Rhambo v. Alexis Smart

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20222:22-cv-02597California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02597-MEMF-RAO Document Filed 04/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-02597-MEMF(RAOx) MICHAEL RHAMBO,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS ALEXIS SMART; and DOES 1 to 10, 15 Defendants.

21 22 On April 19, 2022, Plaintiff Michael Rhambo filed a Complaint against Defendant Alexis Smart, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 51-52 et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 54 et seq.; (4) a claim for restitution and injunctive relief pursuant to California’s Unfair Competition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.