A.R.L.

A.R.L. v. City of Fullerton

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20228:21-cv-00929California5,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-00929-FWS-JDE Document Filed 04/26/ Page 1 of Page ID #:132

77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1100 A.R.L., a minor, individually and as Case No. 21-cv-00929 FWS (JDE) Successor in Interest to JESUS Judge: Hon. Fred W. Slaughter 1111 ESTRADA LEON, deceased, by and Magistrate: Hon. John D. Early through her Guardian Ad Litem, 1122 YAKENZY MARTINEZ,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

1133 Plaintiff, ORDER 1144 v. CITY OF FULLERTON, a municipal 1155 entity; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 1166 Defendants. 1177

1188 Based on the parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 25), and for good cause shown 1199 therein, the Court finds and orders as follows. 2200 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2211 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 2222 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 2233 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 2244 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 2255 enter the following Stipulated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.