Lee James McGrail v. Xavier Beccerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20222:18-cv-03642California1,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:18-cv-03642-JVS-PVC Document Filed 04/28/ Page 1 of Page ID #:2235

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE JAMES MCGRAIL, Case No. CV 18-3642 JVS (PVC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 Petitioner’s vague and conclusory Objections generally reassert arguments already raised in the First Amended Petition and Traverse, which the Magistrate Judge addressed and rejected in the Report and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.