Espinoza

Markel Daniel Rowland v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:21-cv-01668California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-01668-JLS-AGR Document Filed 05/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:154

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION MARKEL DANIEL ROWLAND, ) No. CV 21-1668-JLS (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ) ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED ESPINOZA, et al., ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) 17 On February 17, 2021, Plaintiff, a Los Angeles County jail inmate proceeding pro 18 se and in forma pauperis filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 19 Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (“LASD”) Deputies Alvarado, Batres and Espinoza in 20 their individual capacity. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants Alvarado and Batres have not been 21 served. Defendant Espinoza filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. 22 P. 12(b)(6). This court issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) that 23 recommended denial of the motion. (Dkt. Nos. 24-25.) The District Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.