McDonough

Ja'Naye Granberry v. McDonough

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:22-cv-01870California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01870-ODW-PVC Document9 Filed 05/02/ Page1of3 Page |ID#:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. _CV_ 22-1870 ODW (PVC) Date: May 2, 2022 Title Ja’Naye Granberry v. Denis R. McDonough, Department of Veterans Affairs

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (Dkt. No. 1) SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil nghts complaint against Denis R. McDonough, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, related to her employment at the VA’s Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Medical Center. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). Concurrently with the complaint, Plaintiff filed a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (“IFP Application,” Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.