Sabrina Ross v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20222:22-cv-01532California2,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01532-SB-GJS Document Filed 04/30/ Page 1 of Page ID #:242

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:22-cv-01532-SB-GJS Date: April 30, 2022

Title: Sabrina Ross v. United Airlines, Inc. et al. Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge Jennifer Graciano N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER REMANDING CASE AND AWARDING

ATTORNEY’S FEES

Defendant United Airlines, Inc. (United) removed this case from state court, invoking diversity jurisdiction based on its view that an unserved defendant is not included in determining the existence of complete diversity. Dkt. No. 1. For this view, United relies on the forum-defendant rule—which limits removal jurisdiction when a defendant is sued in the state in which it is a citizen. That the rule serves as a limiting principle is plain from the statutory language requiring the civil action to be “otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.