Lisana Meade v. Jules Helm

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:20-cv-08839California3,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-08839-ODW-JEM Document Filed 05/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:388

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 LISANA MEADE, Case № 2:20-cv-08839-ODW (JEMx)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [16] AND PLAINTIFF’S

14 JULES HELM, MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendant. JUDGMENT [17]

16 I. INTRODUCTION On July 31, 2020, Plaintiff Lisana Meade initiated this action in state court, 19 seeking partition and an accounting for real property she allegedly co-owns with 20 Defendant Jules Helm. (Notice Removal (“NOR”), Ex. A (“Compl.”); ECF No. 1.) 21 On September 25, 2020, Helm removed the action to this Court. (See NOR.) Now, by 22 way of two fully briefed Motions, Helm and Meade each move for summary 23 judgment. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES both Motions.2 24 25 1 (See Def.’s Notice Mot., ECF No. 16; Def.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Helm Mot.”), ECF No. 16-1;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.