Ahmir Ringo v. Blackstone Consulting, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20222:22-cv-01908California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01908-RGK-RAO Document Filed 05/03/ Page 1 of Page ID #:321

JS6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-01908-RGK-RAO Date May 3, 2022 Title AHMIR RINGO, et al v. BLACKSTONE CONSULTING, INC. Present: The R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable Joseph Remigio (not present) Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Remanding Action to State Court On January 18, 2022, Ahmir Ringo (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to PAGA, against Blackstone Consulting, Inc. (“Defendant”). The complaint alleges state statutory claims based on violations of wage hour laws. On March 23, 2022, Defendant removed the action to this Court alleging jurisdiction on the ground of federal question, specifically preemption by the LMRA. Upon review of Defendant’s Notice of Removal, the Court hereby remands the action for lack of subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.