Michael C. Keo v. Two Unoil, LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20228:22-cv-00875California549 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-00875-CJC-JDE Document Filed 05/04/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 22-00875-CJC(JDEx) Date: May 4, 2022
Title: MICHAEL C. KEO V. TWO UNOIL, LLC
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM
On April 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) Plaintiff contends that this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. (Id.)
Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726…