Michael C. Keo v. Two Unoil, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20228:22-cv-00875California549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-00875-CJC-JDE Document Filed 05/04/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SACV 22-00875-CJC(JDEx) Date: May 4, 2022

Title: MICHAEL C. KEO V. TWO UNOIL, LLC

PRESENT:

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY

THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM

On April 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) Plaintiff contends that this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. (Id.)

Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.