Michael David Grant v. Danny Samuels

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20222:22-cv-02595California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02595-JFW-PVC Document11 Filed 05/04/ Pagelof3 Page ID#:131

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. _ CV 22-2595 JFW (PVC) Date: May 4, 2022 Title Michael David Grant v. Danny Samuels, Acting Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS

DUPLICATIVE

On April 10, 2022, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Current Petition,” Dkt. No. 1 at 2; see also Dkt. No. 6 (construing Petitioner’s “Emergency Petition” as a petition for habeas corpus)).! The Current Petition raises one ground for federal habeas relief: Petitioner was wrongfully denied sentencing credits, which would have allowed him to be released in February 2021. (Ud.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.