James Smith v. Ron Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20222:21-cv-04531California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-04531-RSWL-MAA Document Filed 05/03/ Page 1 of Page ID #:590

O

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES SMITH, Case No. 2:21-cv-04531-RSWL (MAA)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. For the following reasons, Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 15) are unpersuasive. Petitioner objects that the Report was “an unreasonable application of clearly established case law from finding Petitioner to be [a] 20 year old adult at the time of the crime in one breath, and, in another breath, finding that California law defines any person under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.