Eric Cleveland v. Young Mi Cha

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20222:22-cv-00759California798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00759-SVW-PVC Document Filed 05/09/ Pagelof2 Page □□ #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-00759-SVW Date May 9, 2022

Title Eric Cleveland v. Young Mi Cha et al

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Paul M. Cruz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: N/A Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A It is the policy of this Court to encourage expedient resolution of civil litigation. Cf Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 (noting that rules of civil procedure should be construed to “secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding”). In accordance with that policy, the Court reminds the parties that “a defendant’s voluntary removal of alleged barriers prior to trial can have the effect of mooting a plaintiff's ADA claim.” Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir. 2011). Ifthe defendant in an ADA case removes the alleged barriers and demonstrates that the alleged barriers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.