Michael George Tater v. City of Huntington Beach

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20228:20-cv-01772California4,608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:20-cv-01772-MEMF-JDE Document Filed 05/11/ Page 1 of Page ID #:871

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 MICHAEL GEORGE TATER, ) Case No. 8:20-cv-01772-MEMF ) individually; KYLA SKYE STANISKIS, ) (JDEx) 11 individually and as Personal ) ) Representative of the Estate of ) PROTECTIVE ORDER SHANNON MICHELLE TATER, ) )

) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a ) ) Governmental Entity; STEPHANI ) 17 WILLIAMS, individually; MICHAEL ) ) WAGNER, individually; NICOLE ) SHOGREN, individually; KELLI ) 19 HERRERA, individually; and DOES ) ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) Based on the Stipulation between Plaintiff Kyla Skye Staniskis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants City Of Huntington Beach ("City"), Stephani Williams, Michael Wagner, Nicole Shogren and Kelli Herrera (collectively “Defendants”) and for good cause shown therein, the Court finds and order as follows, as to Plaintiff and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.