Opendoor Property Acquisition LLC v. Jeffrey Bauman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20228:22-cv-01018California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-01018-JVS-JDE Document Filed 05/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

1 JS-6 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Opendoor Property Acquisition LLC

CASE NUMBER:

10 8:22-cv-01018-JVS-JDEx Plaintiff v. Jeffrey Bauman et al

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of O r a n g e for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” 21 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.