Eric Cleveland v. Bryan Loh

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20222:22-cv-03387California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03387-SB-SK Document Filed 05/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:22-cv-03387-SB-SK Date: May 23, 2022

Title: Eric Cleveland v. Bryan Loh et al.

Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge

Jennifer Graciano N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Eric Cleveland, who is a disabled person and requires the use of a cane, filed this suit alleging that Defendant’s facilities impose physical barriers that impede his access, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Complaint, Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to his ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.