Denise Zapata v. Cambridge Investment Research, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20222:21-cv-09057California295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09057-DSF-PVC Document Filed 05/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:264

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE ZAPATA, 2:21-cv-09057-DSF-PVC Plaintiff, Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not be Remanded for v. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Order to File Supplemental Briefing

CAMBRIDGE INVESTMENT

Regarding California Labor Code RESEARCH, INC., an Iowa § 925 corporation; CAMBRIDGE

INVESTMENT RESEARCH

ADVISORS, INC., an Iowa corporation; NETTUNO & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants.

Defendants removed this action relying solely on diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1 (Notice of Removal). However, Defendants have not adequately pled the citizenship of Nettuno & Associates, LLC. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (“We therefore join our sister circuits and hold that, like a partnership, an LLC is a citizen of every state of which its Case 2:21-cv-09057-DSF-PVC Document Filed 05/25/ Page 2of2 Page ID #:265

owners/members are citizens’). Defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.