Adan Ordonez v. Red Hill Lava Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20222:22-cv-03072California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03072-JLS-MAR Document Filed 05/26/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-03072-JLS-MAR Date: May 26, 2022 Title: Adan Ordonez v. Red Hill Lava Products, Inc. et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

D. Rojas N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

On May 6, 2022, Plaintiff Adan Ordonez filed a Complaint in this Court asserting diversity jurisdiction. (Compl. ¶ 7, Doc. 1.)

No party has raised a jurisdictional objection, however, “[f]ederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). “[T]he district court ha[s] a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction . . . sua sponte, whether the parties raise[] the issue or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.