Jill V. Villa v. Xanitos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20222:22-cv-02991California1,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02991-PA-E Document Filed 05/26/ Page1of4 Page IDS#6160

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-2991 PA (Ex) Date May 26, 2022 Title Jill V. Villa v. Xanitos, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Xanitos, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Notice of Removal (“Removal”), Docket No. 1.) Defendant alleges that this Court possesses diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (““CAFA”). (Id.) On May 6, 2022, the Court issued Defendant an order to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, due to not meeting the amount in controversy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.