I.M.

I.M. v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20222:20-cv-11174California5,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-11174-FMO-JEM Document 134 Filed 05/27/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1502

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 I.M., a minor, by and through her ) CASE NO: 2:20-cv-11174 FMO Guardian Ad Litem, EDWARD TAPIA, EDWARD TAPIA, CHERYL TAPIA- ) (JEMx) RUFENER and BRIANNA PALOMINO, ) Individually and as Successors-In-Interest ) to Decedent, EDWARD BRONSTEIN, FIRST AMENDED ) Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION RE: 15 vs. ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) DOE CHP OFFICERS 1-10, and DOES ) 11-20, Inclusive, )

Defendants. ) ) E.W. and L.W., Minors, by and through ) their Guardian Ad Litem, AUNDREA CHERYL ROSA WAGNER, Individually ) and as Successors-In-Interest to Decedent, ) EDWARD BRONSTEIN )

Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. )

) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity; ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.