Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision PTE LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20222:22-cv-03247California850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03247-FMO-JEM Document Filed 05/31/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-3247 FMO (JEMx) Date May 31, 2022 Title Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision PTE LTD, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal On May 17, 2021, the court dismissed an action brought by plaintiff Peninsula Ventures I LLC (“plaintiff”) against defendant Nano Vision PTE LTD (“Nano”) pursuant to the parties’ stipulation for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). (See Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision PTE LTD, Case No. 20-5332, Dkt. 34, Court’s Order of May 17, 2021). The court did “not retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.” (See id.). On May 12, 2022, plaintiff filed a new complaint against Nano and Steven…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.