Juan Quintanilla Vasquez v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 202423-15278California1,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 7 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ; et al., No. 23-15278

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00755-CW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL DONOVAN; et al.,

Appellants,

v.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: S.R. THOMAS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge. Partial Dissent by Judge BUMATAY

Michael Donovan, Evan Ajin, and Richard Moore appeal the district court’s

order holding them in civil contempt and imposing contempt sanctions based on

their actions as officers and principals (“Principals”) of Libre by Nexus (“LBN”).

We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.