Camarillo-Martinez

Camarillo-Martinez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 202421-1306California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORENA CAMARILLO-MARTINEZ, No. 21-1306 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-601-216 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and DESAI, Circuit Judges, and SOTO, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable James Alan Soto, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Petitioner Lorena Camarillo-Martinez, a citizen of Mexico, appeals a decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her petition for withholding

of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.