Korttney Elliott v. Good Life Enterprises, L.L.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20222:22-cv-03754California1,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03754-FLA-AFM Document Filed 06/03/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22−cv−03754−FLA−AFM Date June 3, 2022 Title KORTTNEY ELLIOTT V. GOOD LIFE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. ET AL

Present: The Honorable Fernando L. Aenlle−Rocha , U. S. District Judge V.R. Vallery Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT

SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

THE STATE LAW CLAIM

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and a claim for damages pursuant to the California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. In the Complaint, Plaintiff requests the court exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act Claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The United States Supreme Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.