Craig Schmitman v. Mark Patton

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20222:22-cv-00291California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00291-PA-AFM Document Filed 06/06/ Pagelof2 Page |ID#:113

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-291 PA (AFMx) Date June 6, 2022 Title Craig Schmitman v. Mark Patton, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman N/A N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—COURT ORDER The parties have not filed the Joint Scheduling Report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), Local Rule 26, and this Court’s Order Scheduling Meeting of Counsel and Setting Scheduling Conference dated April 20, 2022 (“Order Setting Scheduling Conference”). (Docket No. 17.) The Order Setting Scheduling Conference warns: “The failure to submit a joint report in advance of the Scheduling Conference or the failure to attend the Scheduling Conference may result in the dismissal of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.