Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20228:21-cv-00223California2,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document Filed 06/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:865

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No. 8:21-cv-0223-CJC-MAR DOMINIQUE DANIELS,

v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 WAYNE J. DIXON, ET AL. 15 This order shall govern documents produced pursuant to the Court’s June 9, 2022, Minute Order. Dkt. 73. 1. DEFINITIONS 1. Action: [this pending federal lawsuit]. 1. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 1. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 1. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 28 Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document Filed 06/09/ Page 2 of Page ID #:866

1. Designating Party: a Party or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.