Aaron Raiser v. Sheri S. Kleeger

Case 2:21-cv-09344-DSF-KK Document Filed 06/09/ Page 1 of Page ID #:516

1

4 5

7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 AARON RAISER, Case No. CV 21-9344-DSF (KK) 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

SHERI S. KLEEGER, ET AL., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Defendant(s).

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended 20 Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the 21 United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those 22 portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. 23 In Plaintiff’s Objections, he argues the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Antoine v. 24 Byers & Anderson, Inc., 950 F.2d 1471, 1473 (9th Cir. 1991) extended Bivens v. Six 25 Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (“Bivens”) liability to the 26 context of First Amendment access to courts and Fourteenth Amendment due 27 process claims. See dkt. 57 at 1-2 (citing). However, Antoine did not extend Bivens 28 Case 2:21-cv-09344-DSF-KK Document…