Deondre Raglin v. Hyen Ho Kim
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-04153-SVW-PD Document □□ Filed 06/17/ Page1lof3 Page ID#:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. 2:22-ev-04153-SVW-PD Date June 17, 2022
Title Deondre Raglin v. Hyen Ho Kim et al
Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Paul M. Cruz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: N/A Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT
It is the policy of this Court to encourage expedient resolution of civil litigation. Cf Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 (noting that rules of crvil procedure should be construed to “secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding”). In accordance with that policy, the Court reminds the parties that “a defendant’s voluntary removal of alleged barriers prior to trial can have the effect of mooting a plaintiff's ADA claim.” Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir. 2011). Ifthe defendant in an ADA case…