Theresa Brooke v. Mian Extended Stay Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20222:22-cv-04091California857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04091-SVW-PLA Document Filed 06/17/ Page1of3 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-ev-04091-SVW-PLA Date June 17, 2022

Title Theresa Brooke v. Mian Extended Stay Inc.

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Paul M. Cruz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: N/A Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER FOR JOINT STATUS REPORT

It is the policy of this Court to encourage expedient resolution of civil litigation. Cf Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 (noting that rules of crvil procedure should be construed to “secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding”). In accordance with that policy, the Court reminds the parties that “a defendant’s voluntary removal of alleged barriers prior to trial can have the effect of mooting a plaintiff's ADA claim.” Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir. 2011). Ifthe defendant in an ADA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.