Michael Frank Goodwin v. Daniel Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20222:15-cv-09156California4,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:15-cv-09156-JFW-PVC Document Filed 06/17/ Page1of11 Page ID #:2073

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. _ CV 15-9156 JFW (PVC) Date: June 17, 2022 Title Michael Frank Goodwin v. Raymond Madden, Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

STAY IN THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED FOR

PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY

COURT ORDERS

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 10, 2015, Michael Frank Goodwin (‘Petitioner’), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.' (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). Concurrently with the Petition, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Hold and Stay Proceedings in Abeyance,” in which Petitioner requested a stay

Under the “mailbox rule,” a pleading filed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.