Michael Frank Goodwin v. Daniel Paramo
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20222:15-cv-09156California4,180 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:15-cv-09156-JFW-PVC Document Filed 06/17/ Page1of11 Page ID #:2073
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. _ CV 15-9156 JFW (PVC) Date: June 17, 2022 Title Michael Frank Goodwin v. Raymond Madden, Warden
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
STAY IN THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED FOR
PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY
COURT ORDERS
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 10, 2015, Michael Frank Goodwin (‘Petitioner’), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.' (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). Concurrently with the Petition, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Hold and Stay Proceedings in Abeyance,” in which Petitioner requested a stay