Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20222:22-cv-03859California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03859-GW-KS Document Filed 06/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-3859 GW (KS) Date: June 21, 2022 Title Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: n/a Attorneys Present for Defendant: n/a

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On June 3, 2022, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the “Complaint”). (Dkt. No. 1.) The Complaint is a single page suing Defendant Proland Management concerning a writ of attachment imposed on an asset of Plaintiff’s, as well as Plaintiff having a “low income or Section 8” application denied. (Id.)

At the outset, the Complaint fails to describe any constitutional violation or what specific acts on the part of Defendant constituted unconstitutional conduct. The Complaint, therefore, violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.