Hasso

Hasso v. Johnson CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2013E053666California5,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/28/13 Hasso v. Johnson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALAN HASSO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E053666

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC369859)

JESSE JOHNSON et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Gary B. Tranbarger,

Judge. Affirmed.

Michael Creamer for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mundell, Odlum & Haws, Karl N. Haws and Jim C. Moore for Defendants and

Respondents.

Following a one-day bench trial, judgment was entered in favor of defendants and

respondents Jesse Johnson (Jesse) and Wynema Johnson (Defendants) and against

plaintiff and appellant Alan Hasso (Plaintiff)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.