Samuel Love v. Mark G. Stainbrook

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20222:22-cv-02878California1,499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02878-FLA-GJS Document Filed 06/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:141

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 2:22-cv-02878-FLA (GJS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v.

MARK G. STAINBROOK, et al., Defendants.

16 17 On April 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint, which bore the title of “Rape and Physical Injury Lawsuit for Injunctive and Equittable [sic] Relief, Monetary Damages, and Punitive Damages.” Dkt. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiff sues 23 Defendants, who are listed in the Complaint as: Mark G. Stainbrook; Huma Ahmed; Karen S. Lynch; “The Four Policy Officers From The Beverly Hills Police Station”; CVS Manager “‘Venus’”; Eric Garcetti, Mayor of Los Angeles; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California; Rob Bonta, Attorney General for California; Rochelle Walensky, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Dave North; Matthew Walton; John E. Chaquica; Carla Smith; the Beverly Hills Police Station; the City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.