Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government

I. INTRODUCTION

The Court finds that Alphabet’s motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L-R. 7-15. Accordingly, the matter is hereby taken under submission. On January 13, 2022, Benjamin Woodhouse, representing himself, and Havensight Capital L.L.C. (collectively, “plaintiff’) filed this action against defendants the United States Government, the Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld Jr., the Hon. R. Gary Klausner, the Hon. Fernando M. Olguin, the Hon. Manuel L. Real, now deceased, the Hon. Otis D. Wright II, Daniel Beck, Tracy Wilkison, David Harris, Joanne Osinoff, and the Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez (collectively, “defendants”). Dkt. 1 (‘Compl.”). Plaintiff brought his complaint against defendants for their actions “as [] governmental officialls],” complaining that that defendants “engag|ed] in alleged obstruction, cit{[ed] to criminal conduct, in a defective Minutes Order, |] allegedly interfere[ed] with Judge Klaus[ner], who 1s also a named Defendant, |] obstruct[ed] due process[,] and tr[1ed] to abrogate the right to file a Complaint against the U.S. Government.” Id. at 3. Plaintiff's initial complaint alleged the following…