Kurtis Kooiman v. Siwell, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20228:20-cv-00565California2,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:20-cv-00565-JLS-DFM Document Filed 06/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:686

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 8:20-cv-00565-JLS-DFM

KURTIS KOOIMAN V. SIWELL, INC. ET

AL FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1 Case 8:20-cv-00565-JLS-DFM Document Filed 06/23/ Page 2 of Page ID #:687

Plaintiff Kurtis Kooiman initiated this action against Defendant Siwell, Inc. dba Capital Mortgage Service of Texas (“Capital Mortgage”) to recover monies he alleged Capital Mortgage owed to him as a result of its failure to pay commissions and reimburse his business expenses. The matter was fully tried and submitted for decision. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). Having considered the evidence, the parties’ objections to the evidence, the credibility of the trial witnesses, and both parties’ arguments at trial, the Court finds in favor of Kooiman and finds he is entitled to the reimbursement of reasonable business expenses incurred in operating the Mission Viejo branch of Capital Mortgage, commissions commensurate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.