People v. Mendoza CA4/1

DISCUSSION

The facts of the underlying crimes are not relevant to the issues raised by this appeal. We will not include a statement of facts in this opinion. As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and

2 in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified two possible issues for the court’s consideration: 1. Whether the one year enhancement for the prison prior was eligible for relief under section 1172.75. 2. Whether the enhancement for the prison prior that was imposed and stayed was eligible for relief under section 1172.75. We have reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Mendoza on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Mendoza’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.55 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3