Jeanine Rogers v. Trek Bicycle Corporation
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20222:22-cv-02960California709 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-02960-SB-AFM Document Filed 06/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:203
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 2:22-cv-02960-SB-AFM Date: June 29, 2022
Title: Jeanine Rogers v. Trek Bicycle Corporation et al.
Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge
Jennifer Graciano N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
N/A N/A
Proceedings: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. No. 14]
Plaintiff Jeanine Rogers moves to remand this case, arguing that Defendant Trek Bicycle Corporation’s removal on May 3, 2022 was untimely because Plaintiff had emailed a copy of the summons and complaint to defense counsel on March 29. Dkt. No. 14. In opposition, Defendant correctly argues that the motion should be denied because (1) Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s meet and confer requirements and (2) removal was timely. Dkt. No. 20. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and…