Jeanine Rogers v. Trek Bicycle Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20222:22-cv-02960California709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02960-SB-AFM Document Filed 06/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:203

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:22-cv-02960-SB-AFM Date: June 29, 2022

Title: Jeanine Rogers v. Trek Bicycle Corporation et al.

Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge

Jennifer Graciano N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. No. 14]

Plaintiff Jeanine Rogers moves to remand this case, arguing that Defendant Trek Bicycle Corporation’s removal on May 3, 2022 was untimely because Plaintiff had emailed a copy of the summons and complaint to defense counsel on March 29. Dkt. No. 14. In opposition, Defendant correctly argues that the motion should be denied because (1) Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s meet and confer requirements and (2) removal was timely. Dkt. No. 20. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.