Jarred Tyler Earnest v. San Bernardino County

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20225:22-cv-00655California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00655-JAK-DFM Document? Filed 07/07/ Pagelof3 Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 22-00655-JAK (DFM) Date: July 7, 2022 Title Jarred Tyler Earnest v. San Bernadino County

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge Naney Boehme Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why the First Amended Petition _ Should Not Be Dismissed as Unexhausted On April 13, 2022, Petitioner Jarred Tyler Earnest constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Dkt. 1. On April 18, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the Petition should not be summarily dismissed. See Dkt. 4. The Court noted that the Petition was largely blank, and that Petitioner appeared to challenge state evidentiary determinations, which are not cognizable on federal habeas review.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.