Vizio, Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20222:20-cv-06864California4,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-06864-ODW-AS Document 165 Filed 07/19/ Page 1 of Page ID #:9945

O

2 3 4

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 VIZIO, INC., Case № 2:20-cv-06864-ODW (ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT [140] ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vizio, Inc. brought this action against Defendants Arch Insurance 19 Company and Navigators Insurance Company based on its claim that Defendants 20 failed to provide benefits pursuant to the terms of Vizio’s primary and excess 21 insurance policies. (See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 27.) On January 19, 2022, Vizio 22 filed its Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”), (ECF No. 139). Arch now moves to 23 dismiss Vizio’s FAC under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). 24 (Notice Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 140; Mem. Supp. Mot. (“Mot.” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.