Rainier
Rainier v. Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 2024E079647California4,830 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/7/24 Rainier v. Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
STEPHEN D. RAINIER,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E079647, E080308
v. (Super.Ct.No. CVRI2202077)
PARADISE CHEVROLET CADILLAC, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
CONSOLIDATED APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Riverside
County. Craig Riemer and Angel M. Bermudez, Judges. Affirmed.
Fine, Boggs & Perkins, John P. Boggs, David J. Reese and William D. Wheelock
for Defendant and Appellant.
Bibiyan Law Group, David D. Bibiyan and Henry G. Glitz for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
Defendant and appellant Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac (Paradise) appeals…