Shannon Hausey v. The City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20222:21-cv-10006California5,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-10006-SSS-GJS Document Filed 07/20/ Page 1 of Page ID #:196

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON HAUSEY, an Individual, Case No. 2:21-cv-10006-SSS (GJSx) Plaintiff, [Assigned to Judge Sunshine S. Sykes, USDC- Riverside, Ctrm 2; Magistrate Gail J. Standish, Roybal v. Bldg., Ctrm 640] 13 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES; and DOE OFFICERS 1-5, inclusive, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER1

Defendants.

16 17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.