Christopher Stone v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:22-cv-01150California6,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01150-ODW-RAO Document Filed 07/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:287

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 CHRISTOPHER STONE, Case № 2:22-cv-01150-ODW (RAOx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING COUNTY’S

v.

MOTION TO DISMISS [21] AND

14 CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., CITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS [24]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION On March 18, 2022, pro se Plaintiff Christopher Stone filed the operative First 19 Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against the City of Los Angeles (the “City”); Los 20 Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) Chief Michael Moore, Los Angeles City 21 Attorney Mike Feuer, the County of Los Angeles (the “County”); County Sheriff Alex 22 Villanueva; and Herman Thomas (“Thomas”)—for violations of state and federal law 23 arising from an attempt to serve and enforce certain restraining orders. (See FAC, 24 ECF No. 16.) The County and City each filed a separate motion to dismiss pursuant 25 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). The County moves to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.