Colton Bryant v. St. More Investment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:22-cv-03951California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03951-MEMF-PD Document Filed 07/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-03951-MEMF-PD COLTON BRYANT,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS ST. MORE INVESTMENT, INC.; and 15 DOES 1 to 10, 16 Defendants.

On June 9, 2022, Plaintiff Colton Bryant filed a Complaint against Defendants St. More

Investment, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq.; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 51–52 et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, CAL. CIV. CODE § 54 et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to CAL. HEALTH…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.