Juan Ayala v. Warren L. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:21-cv-09957California855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09957-CAS-AS Document Filed 07/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:1983

O 1

4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JUAN AYALA, Case No. 2:21-cv-09957-CAS(AS) Petitioner, 12 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS WARREN L. MONTGOMERY, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 14 Respondent. JUDGE 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition in this case, and all relevant pleadings and other documents filed and lodged in this action, including the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 17, “Report”), and Petitioner’s Objection to the Report (Dkt. 18, “Objection”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters to which objections have been stated. Petitioner’s assertions and arguments have been reviewed carefully. The Court, however, concludes that nothing set forth in the Objection or otherwise in the record for this case affects or alters, or calls into question, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.