Ross Cornell v. Office of the District Attorney, County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20225:22-cv-00789California277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:22-cv-00789-JWH-SHK Document Filed 07/25/ Page 1 of Page ID #:823

1 J S -6 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSS CORNELL, an individual, and Case No. 5:22-cv-00789-JWH-SHK BRYAN ESTRADA, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT 13 v.

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT

ATTORNEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 5122-cv-00789-JWH-SHK Document Filed 07/25/ Page 2of2 Page ID #:824

Pursuant to the “Memorandum Opinion and Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion 2|| For Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 22]” entered substantially 3 || contemporaneously herewith, and in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal 4|| Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. The operative pleading is the First Amended Complaint [ECF 7|| No. 18] filed by Plaintiffs Ross Cornell and Bryan Estrada. 2. The Court deems it appropriate to ABSTAIN from exercising 9|| …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.