Marquise Bailey v. Joseph Kling

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20222:22-cv-05224California799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05224-SB-PLA Document Filed 07/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:22-cv-05224-SB-PLA Date: July 29, 2022

Title: Marquise Bailey v. Joseph Kling et al.

Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge

Jennifer Graciano N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

N/A N/A

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Marquise Bailey, who requires the use of a wheelchair when traveling in public, filed this suit alleging that Defendant’s facilities impose physical barriers that impede his access, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to his ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.