Brar

Yogurtland Franchising, Inc. v. Brar

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20228:22-cv-00508California2,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-00508-SB-PLA Document Filed 07/29/ Page 1 of Page ID #:262

2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

11 YOGURTLAND FRANCHISING, Case No. 8:22-cv-00508-SB-PLA INC., a California corporation, Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Plaintiff, Courtroom 6C 14 v. ORDER REOPENING ACTION AND

ENTERING CONSENT JUDGMENT

RAMANJIT BRAR, an individual, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 8:22-cv-00508-SB-PLA Document Filed 07/29/ Page 2 of Page ID #:263

Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff Yogurtland Franchising, Inc. and Defendant Ramanjit Brar (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that this matter be reopened for the limited purpose of entering the Parties’ consent judgment for the entry of a permanent injunction. It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the Court may enter the following consent judgment pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.