Aldo Pizano v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20222:22-cv-05249California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05249-RGK-MRW Document Filed 08/01/ Page 1 of Page ID #:116

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-05249-RGK-MRW Date August 1, 2022 Title Aldo Pizano v. Ford Motor Company, et al.

JS6

Present: The R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable Joseph Remigio Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Order Remanding Action to State Court On June 17, 2021, Aldo Pizano (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) alleging breaches of express and implied warranties pursuant to the Song-Beverly Warranty Act. On July 28, 2022, Defendant removed the action to federal court alleging jurisdiction on the grounds of diversity of citizenship. Upon review of Defendant’s Notice of Removal, the Court hereby remands the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, district courts shall have original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.