Neil Breitbard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:22-cv-00653California257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00653-JAK-PVC Document Filed 08/02/ Page 1 of Page ID #:128

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEIL BREITBARD, Case No. CV 22-0653 JAK (PVC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 24 IT IS ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint is dismissed. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to the doctrine announced in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.