Case 2:22-cv-00653-JAK-PVC Document 17 Filed 08/02/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:128

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NEIL BREITBARD, Case No. CV 22-0653 JAK (PVC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

13 v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORRECTIONS AND

15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, 19 all the records and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the 20 United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report 21 and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the 22 Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the 23 Magistrate Judge. 24 25 IT IS ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint is dismissed. Judgment shall 26 be entered dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to the doctrine announced in 27 Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). 28 Case ?:22-cv-00653-JAK-PVC Document □□ Filed 08/02/22 Page 2of2 Page ID #:129

1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the 2 || Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record. 4 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 6 || DATED: August 2, 2022 Gm VW

8 JOHN A. KRONSTADT 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28