Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. D. Melo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20222:20-cv-05935California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-05935-JFW-ADS Document Filed 08/05/ Page 1 of Page ID #:604

1 2 3 4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 KENYATTA Q. MITCHELL, Case No. 2:20-05935 JFW (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

D. MELO, et al., RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 44), all opposition and reply papers, (Dkt. Nos. 63-65), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. No. 71). On August 2, 2022, Defendants filed objections. (Dkt. No. 73.) The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 24 ase 2:20-cv-05935-JFW-ADS Document Filed 08/05/ Page2of2 Page ID #:

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.