Destini Kanan v. Thinx, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20222:20-cv-10341California1,698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-10341-SSS-JPR Document Filed 08/08/ Page 1 of Page ID #:933

J S -

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HALEH ALLAHVERDI and HALEY Case No. 2:20-cv-10341-SSS-JPRx BURGESS, individually and on behalf 12 of all others similarly situated, (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE JOINT STATEMENT IN Plaintiffs, RESPONSE TO ORDER DENYING

STIPULATED DISMISSAL [DKT.

v. 74] AND GRANTING RENEWED THINX, INC., REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Defendants. 18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Haleh Allahverdi and Haley Burgess and Defendant Thinx Inc.’s Joint Statement in Response to Order Denying Stipulated Dismissal and the Parties’ renewed joint request to dismiss this case without prejudice. [Dkt. 74]. On June 27, 2022, the Parties filed a stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). [Dkt. 71]. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.